The police must now assess Kasi-Jesper's accusations against Pandora

Jesper "Kasi" Nielsen's years-long accusations

that the jewelry company Pandora has cheated

him for a million, has now landed on the police

table.

National Unit for Special Crime (NSK)

confirms to Finance that it has received

a review from Jesper Nielsen, and that it has

talked to him about the matter.

NSK has no further comments and will

nor answer whether a

outright investigation.

The dispute between Jesper Nielsen and Pandora

stretches all the way back to 2010, when Jesper

Nielsen's company, Kasi ApS, sold its shares in a

jointly owned distribution company for Pandora.

Pandora paid around 400 million DKK up front,

but at the same time an earn out was agreed, which

could issue an additional payment to Kasi ApS

depending on the distribution company's financial

performance until 2015.

When the earn out was to be made up, the company had

the priesthood was so poor that there was not so much as

one crown to Kasi ApS.

Jesper Kasi Nielsen has since claimed that Pandora

messed with the accounts and thus deceived

him a considerable amount. The question has, however,

previously been dealt with in an arbitration court, and it

So far, Jesper Nielsen has not succeeded in

document their actions.

He recently reported the matter to the police, which means

has now "talked to" Jesper Nielsen about the matter. He

doesn't have any comments myself.

Lawyer at Pandora Jeppe Jensen says:

"Neither the Arbitration Court, the Commercial Court

or @stre The High Court has found in favor of Jesper

Nielsen's accusations, and we consider

the police report as pure harassment and an expression

for desperation. We cooperate of course with

NSK to the extent that they had to, so they can

get their investigations completed as soon as possible

possible.«

In addition to the police report, Jesper Nielsen and

his family sued Pandora in court on

Frederiksberg. Here Pandora has argued

that the case be dismissed because disputes over

The earn out agreement according to the original agreement must

be settled in arbitration - and that has already happened.

»Pandora rejects and strongly distances itself from the

serious allegations in the lawsuit about fraud.

Because the matter is so "far out" in all respects and

can and must be eliminated already as a result of the

above-mentioned circumstances, Pandora does not find

reason to be embarrassed at this stage

the accusations, which are simply disputed and rejected,

it is stated in a response from Pandora to the court.